Cut off
Set one weekly reporting time so every log and exception is reviewed against the same project snapshot.
Menu
SAMPLE WORKFLOW / 02
Open items visible. Decisions ready by Friday.
This sample shows how a weekly administration rhythm can turn several active logs into one review-ready project pulse while official responses and project decisions stay with authorized team members.
THE STARTING CONDITION
What turns Friday reporting into another reconstruction exercise.
RFIs, submittals, potential changes, procurement items, and meeting actions are tracked in different places. The project manager knows something is late but still has to reconcile statuses before deciding what needs attention.
ILLUSTRATIVE FRIDAY PULSESample records only
Open itemAgeNext ownerReview status
RFI-024 / ceiling conflict9 daysDesign teamResponse due
SUB-071 / door hardware6 daysProject managerApproval review
PCO-013 / revised feeder4 daysEstimatorPricing input
CONTROLLED INPUTS
The weekly review needs one cutoff, reliable source records, and named authority.
The administrator can reconcile and escalate only when the team agrees which system controls status, who owns the next action, and who may issue an official response.
- Current project directory and responsibility matrix
- Client-owned RFI, submittal, and change records
- Agreed weekly reporting cutoff
- Due-date and aging rules for each log
- Authorized response, approval, and escalation roles
- Meeting actions, procurement items, and closeout priorities
THE OPERATING CYCLE
Five steps from source logs to a decision-ready Friday pulse.
Reconcile
Compare source records, confirm current status, correct obvious administrative gaps, and flag conflicting information.
Age
Group open items by due date, days open, responsible role, and the next action required to move the record.
Escalate
Surface items that need technical input, official response, cost or schedule decisions, contractual action, or leadership attention.
Publish
Assemble the review pack with open-item summaries, decisions required, owners, dates, and links to the controlling records.
VISIBLE OUTPUTS
What the project team should be able to review in one sitting.
These are sample deliverables, not guaranteed turnaround or performance commitments. Final scope depends on the contractor’s systems, volume, and review requirements.
- 01Aging RFI and submittal list
- 02Changes awaiting scope, pricing, or approval
- 03Procurement and long-lead exceptions
- 04Meeting actions without a current owner or date
- 05Decisions-required queue
- 06Closeout and document-collection priorities
THE AUTHORITY BOUNDARY
Administrative visibility does not create project authority.
The managed lane can maintain logs, assemble context, draft routine follow-up, and escalate overdue actions. These project decisions remain controlled by authorized participants.
Technical interpretations and official RFI responses
Submittal approval, rejection, and release decisions
Scope, cost, schedule, and change authorization
Contractual notices and client commitments
Final document acceptance and record closure
30-DAY PILOT SCORECARD
Judge the workflow by record quality and decision readiness.
Are the agreed project logs present and reviewed at the weekly cutoff?
Do statuses, dates, and source links match the controlling project records?
Does every exception identify the next responsible role and required action?
Can the project manager make decisions without rebuilding the report?
PROJECT ADMIN PILOT
Map my workflow Run one reporting cycle with a defined cutoff and reviewer.
Start with the active logs, source systems, responsibility matrix, escalation rules, and the decisions your project manager needs every Friday.